KINCHIK

"Theres a hole in my bucket, dear lisa,dear lisa, theres a hole in my bucket dear lisa a hole"

the science in the speed of jet is meaningless without a mind and without religion who started education to understand science. so far as we know, the bible is the earliest text who talks about stars, the meaning "universe, stars, earth, creation, and darwinian evolution " was invented by the people who wrote the bible

if God started everything at some point, God had to start its self, so god made Its self which means to make somthing you must begin with thought which means everything exists because of thought which means all enegy is thought an if thats the case then everything is in a constant dream state my guess is thats why we sleep to reconect we most probaly are all god an need love/hate dark/light rich/poor to know what each thing is. my question is why did we createte our selves? for the sake of it?

ignorant same one should put a bullet in your head

we can only hope.....................

@KingJoeKong That's the most repeated series of questions in religion, philosophy and science combined. I like Carl Sagan's point -- one I made myself before hearing him -- that if adding a god doesn't answer the question but only extends it, why not just save a step? In other words, cut god out of the equation.

I never thought of this before, but if there was an inflationary period in the past, then it must have slowed down at one point. Could the current expanding universe be yet another inflation? If so, what causes these inflations? I've heard the explanation from M-theory (branes colliding), but I wonder what else could explain this.

this whole "religion VS science" thing is like an algebra word problem. "Religion starts off on a donkey in Jerusalem going 5mph. Science starts off in a jet, thousands of years later, going 500mph -- when will science pass religion?

in time, (if our racial ineptness allows) we'll figure it all out.

I do belive scientists have alot in common with RELIGIOUS OMNIPOTENT believers when it comes to BIG things which can't be tested. If one looks at even small things i.e some reasction on small and large scale ,one can see that there can be differentiation. I think science is NO were near answering such large questions with RELIGIOUS mindedness. Scientists have gone too far of themselves and in most cases as this one;in my view they are Deluded and some how self obessed with BIG things and ideas.

this pussy sounds like my DOPPLER RADAR lol!

Hmm, the idea of mini bubbles starting off just seems to push the question of Origin beyond the observable universe, rather than really _answer_ it. What provides the "medium" or "space" for the expanding bubbles?

This is why some people have faith in a god, and when they die everything will be answered, to others it makes life seem like and illusion. I have a full lifetime ahead of me to think about itMaybe i should go to china and become a tibetian monk. They meditate all day. Thats alot of thinking time.

One person was saying he understood time began with the big bang, but what happened before it?Do humans have the mental capacity to comprehend such great questions?Maybe we do.wat if its simple answer, like god actually made the universe.then someone could ask who made the god? There will always be more questions. Nothing will ever really be answered.

Time stands still, we move in relation to it.

"how" has been answered but "why" i think no one knows xD

I completely understand that time began with the big bang, and that saying before the big bang it doesnt make sense, since time began with it. The question is why and how time suddenly switch on.

if u wanna answer ur questions... study physics!! i recommend u its a beatiful world

yes thats true, and know that if you want to answer those questions u must have some knowledge of physics. one can keep giving you examples, experiments made, etc but u wont still get the point the problem stephen hawkin always had he thinks every1 has his level of knowledge, and gives conferences open to public with pictures, jokes, awesom analogies but hes very wrong. anyways it would be boring to give a conference with only mathematical calculations xD

When you try to understand something you ask questions, but if you can't even answer them that is a serious problem.

u must understand a theory to criticize it

I dont claim I know anything, Im just criticizing a theory. And a theory its not an absolute truth, and it has always room for doubt. True scientists know that there are many questions without a scientific answer yet. So thats when belief comes in. As soon as you say I think or I believe its not science anymore.

and this concept about the time is just the same case... people considered "time is relative, not absolute" this concept hard to believe coz one measures 10 seconds here.. and it is 10 seconds in china, france, australia, etc. But actually when you travel at a considerable fraction of speed of light (for example, 90%) while you measure 10 seconds, som1 on earth (travelin at speed of rotation of earth) would actually measure 23 seconds (consider same gravity at both space)

u claim u know the concept but then u start talkin bout a before big bang again. It is just like claiming u know earth is round.. but then start talking bout what would happen at the edge of the earth... askin what happens at the edge of the earth is a meaningless question... why? coz theres no edge... and that concept was hard to swallow at 1400.. coz people could actually see "an edge" (the horizon) and there was no airplane and obviously people didnt feel like being steping over somthin round

Exactly, Science its the area of whats observable and by experiment. It says what is in the physical world that we can observe and experiment repeatedly. Outside of that its a belief system, weather is right or not its just a belief system. So they just can't say "Oh thats not a valid question". If according to some people science have all the answers thats an answer you gotta give me.